Quiz-1
- Pavan is liable, because he should not have stared typing class in his house.
- Pavan is liable. Because as a neighbor. He should have realized jeevan's delicate nature
- Pavan is not liable because typing sound not disturb anyone else other than jeevan
- None of the above
- X can held responsible for trespass in good
- X cannot be held responsible for trespass good as he was under a wrong belief
- X has not committed any wrong
- None of the above
- a) Krishnan will be liable, because he owed a duty reasonable care to everybody on the road including Laksmi.
- b) Krishnan will not be liable because he could not have foreseen Lakshmi suffering form nervous shock as a result of his act.
- c) Krishnan will be liable to Lakshmi because he failed to drive carefully.
- d) None of the above
- a) The defendant is liable for nuisance.
- b) The defendant was not liable for nuisance
- c) The defendant was liable under the principle of
- d) The plaintiffs suit should be decreed in his favor.
- a) Brooke bond and Co. shall be liable because Sanjay was in the course of employment at the time of accident
- b) Brooke bond and co.., shall not be liable sanjay was not in the course of employment when he took Ruhina inside the car
- c) Ruhina got into the car at her own risk and therefore she cannot sue anybody
- d) None of the above
- a) MONU can sue SONU on the ground that he was denied to cast vote which is a fundamental right
- b) MONU can sue SONU on the ground that he was denied to cast vote which is a legal right.
- c) MONU cannot sue SONU because there is no injury or damage caused to MONU
- d) MONU cannot sue SONU becausetowhom he sought to vote was declared elected
- a) X cannot be held responsible for trespass of good as he was under a wrong belief
- b) X can be held responsible for trespass for goods.
- c) X has no right over the carashe purchased it from a person who had n title over it.
- d) None of the above.
- a)Lalit is not liable in view of the clear notice against trespassers.
- b) Lalit is not liable for having kept a bull on his farm
- c) Lalit is not liable to the people other than his customers.
- d) Lalit is liable because in fact he allowed the people to use his premises.
- a)Kiara shall be held liable for defamation as she published a statement which was injurious to Ricky's reputation.
- b) Rudra shall be held liable as he had led Kiara into thinking that he was Ricky Thakur and moreover, it was his fault in the first place that made Kiara create this website.
- c) Kiara cannot be held liable as she had actually been referring to Rudra and not the real Ricky Thakur.
- d) Kiara cannot be held liable as her act was done in good faith as she intended to warn other girls.
- a) UCIL is liable only to the extent of contamination caused it does not need to pay the authorities caused it does not need to pay the authorizes the entire amount demanded by them.
- b) The authorities are to the whom sum .as UCIL shall be held liable for all repercussions of their act even if they exercise due care.
- c) UCIL can plead that the escape of their been caused by a storm and not due to negligence. It was an inevitable accident.
- d) The municipal authorities should have analyzed the damage first before jumping into action it was due to their own own negligence because of which they had to shell out more than required .
To Know the Answer Please Click Here :